MobileBizBuzz

May 4, 2010

The End of an Era

Filed under: Mobile Apps — Tags: , , , Mike @ 9:15 am

Last week witnessed the end of an era as Hewlett Packard announced its intent to purchase the beleaguered Palm. Engadget did a story with their take on the new Palm logo (seen at the right). I think there are three primary lessons the industry can learn from the demise of Palm.

The first lesson is nobody is big enough to not fail. Unlike in the financial sector, in the mobile handset environment no company, no matter what success they have had in the past is safe. It’s hard to realize at this point in time that Palm essentially invented what we all know as the smartphone today. Few in the industry would argue that point, but here we are 5-6 years later and Palm has been experiencing a descent into the depths for the past 3 years.  In 2004 it would have been as unimaginable to think Palm would fail, as it would be to think Apple would fail today, and yet here we are. Nobody is safe in this world.

The second lesson is to innovate or die. Palm, was once on the top of the heap with the most sophisticated, and yet easy to use, handsets on the market. They had a smaller, but no less enthusiastic following than Apple has today. I’m not sure why it happened, but somewhere around 2007 Palm quit innovating. Oh, I imagine in the labs they were working on new ideas, but they weren’t seeing the light of day. From the time they came out with the Treo 600, clear up through the Centro, there was nothing really new with the Palm handsets…a little more memory here, a smaller form factor there, and a few bells and whistles, but nothing significant to speak of. Unlike Palm, Apple just recently announced a completely new mobile device with the iPad. On the surface it might seem like a giant iPhone, but in fact at MacroSolve are already starting to develop entirely new business applications for the iPad. There’s no rest for the weary in the mobile handset market.

The final lesson is that applications are key to success. While Apple may have introduced the App Store concept, it is no longer unique to Apple.  Android already has over 30,000 applications on Android Market, and it’s market share is rapidly climbing. BlackBerry is struggling to get much traction with applications. Last I saw there were under 5000 apps in BlackBerry App World. That’s not much for an app store that has been in existence for just over a year. Interestingly, while BlackBerry is the clear leader in smartphone market share, their market share has been slipping over the last several months. While there are many variables that play into  market share in this market, I’d suggest the number and quality of applications available is one key variable.

So, if you’re a smartphone maker three things are worth focusing on:

  1. Don’t grow complacent no matter how great the accolades,
  2. Continue to innovate on new device ideas and capabilities, and
  3. Whatever you do, make sure you have a healthy, happy, and growing  developer community.

June 12, 2009

Smartphone Shootout

pre-and-iphoneWell, it’s finally here.  Palm launched the Pre last Saturday, and they are now finally in direct competition with Apple and the iPhone.  So which one’s better?  For me, I think the verdict is still out.

By now, unless you live under a rock somewhere, I’m sure you know how successful the iPhone has been.  They have sold millions of devices in the two years the phone has been out, and users have downloaded over 1 billion applications in the year since the App Store was available.  Apple also broke a lot of long standing rules in the cellular industry by having the phone activated through iTunes instead of directly with AT&T, and also by funneling users through iTunes for content instead of through AT&T.  The iPhone was also ground breaking in that it introduced the concept of using gestures via a touch screen to interact with the device.  What they have accomplished is truly amazing.

Don’t count out Palm just yet.  Palm has traditionally been very strong with “prosumers”.  This is a term they coined to talk about their sweet spot in terms of users.  The demographic Palm originally catered to with the Treo was professional people who purchased their own devices and used it both for work and personal purposes.  Add to that the fact that they pioneered the whole smartphone segment 5 years ago, and you have a pretty accomplished competitor for Apple.  The new Pre has a slick little physical keyboard, a very nice touch screen, and a gesture base user interface.  Sprint says the Pre broke all of their sales records for new devices.  Sounds kind of like the iPhone, doesn’t it?

I think the real battle is still to come.  WebOS has some very interesting capabilities with it’s application platform.  It allows applications to integrate with the web, on device information, and across applications.  Of course there aren’t many applications on the device yet.  It will be interesting to see what developers come up with on the Pre.  Part of what has made the iPhone successful is the slew of applications that have been introduced by developers outside of Apple.  I’ll be curious to see how many, and what types of applications get introduced for the Pre.

April 9, 2009

What’s a Dell To Do?

Filed under: Industry News,Mobile Devices — Tags: , , , Chris @ 1:54 pm

PalmDellLogoRumors have long circulated that Dell would be entering the smartphone market. As far as rumors go, that one seems believable. After all, they’ve gone from making personal computers out of a garage to becoming a massive manufacturer/distributor of desktop computers, laptops/notebooks, netbooks, monitors, servers, storage component, etc. They even had a (not so well receivied PDA, the Axim, in 2007). Why not get in the smartphone market now?

Well, it sounds like they have been trying to do just that. Unfortunately, the prototypes they’ve been shopping around seem to have been, well, boring. In other words, no iPhone killers. In fact, the only rumored iPhone killer that anyone is even talking about is Palm’s new Pre. So what’s a Dell to do? Wait…I have an idea! Dell should buy Palm! While that move wouldn’t guarantee Dell’s success, some analysts think it is a good idea. In fact, it may be the only reasonable way for Dell to enter the market this late in the game. Regardless, if Dell is serious about jumping in, they have one heck of a hill to climb.

What do you think? Should Dell go it alone or should they buy Palm? Here’s some more information to help you craft your thoughts:

palmdelllogoxsmallMichael Dell hints at smartphones, mobile Internet devices – InfoWorld
palmdelllogoxsmallDell’s iPhone Killer rejected by carriers as too dull – AppleInsider
palmdelllogoxsmallMore details on Dell’s supposed smartphone – CNet
palmdelllogoxsmallA Dell Smartphone Would Face Big Hurdles – Business Week
palmdelllogoxsmallPalm Pre a Bump in Dell’s Smartphone Road? – Pre Central
palmdelllogoxsmallHandoff: Why Dell Needs to Buy Palm Now – Fast Company

March 3, 2009

App Store Analysis

Filed under: Mobile Apps,Mobile in SMB — Tags: , , , , , , , Mike @ 3:37 pm

Global Intelligence Alliance Group has just released an analysis of several app stores for mobile applications.  By this time we are all very familiar with the iPhone App Store, and the fact we are so familiar with it is pretty amazing.  It was launched only eight months ago, but currently boasts over 15,000 applications and surpassed 500 million downloads back in January of this year.  About all you can say is “Wow!”  But since that isn’t very enlightening, I’ll try to provide some observations on app stores in general. 

app-storeFirst of all it’s important to remember that only two app stores actually exist.  These are the iPhone App Store and the Android Marketplace.  All the others you may have heard about like Ovi from Nokia, Skymarket from Microsoft, BlackBerry Apps Storefront, and the webOS Software Store from Palm are all just announcements right now.  That’s right.  You can buy any software you want from an app store as long as your smartphone is an iPhone or the G1 phone.  That’s it.  There are not any other choices right now today.

So why all the noise about what are essentially download sites for only two devices?  Because until the iPhone App Store, if you wanted a mobile application for your smartphone, you had to either go through a carrier storefront (which tend to be limited and difficult to navigate) or hunt around the Internet for software to download from sites that may or may not be legitimate.  So being able to go one trusted place for software for your device is a big deal.  Add to that the fact that one of the devices has sold like no other mobile device before and you see why app stores are getting so much press.

But for all the positive press, and it is certainly well-deserved positive press, there are still some issues that need to be addressed to really free users.  In no particular order some of the biggest issues are:

  1. Searching has to be improved – In some cases even if you know the name of the application it can be difficult to find in the iPhone App Store.  This problem will only get worse as the number of applications grows, and as business applications begin to populate the store.
  2. Many more devices must be supported – With the announcement of several new app stores this problem should improve over time.  I still wonder how useful it will be if you are a small business and have to go to the iPhone App Store for one person, the BlackBerry Apps Storefront for another, and the webOS Software Store for another.  That’s not a very effective way for a small business user to find what they need for their business.  And that brings me to the third point.
  3. Business applications have to be supported – Right now all of the app stores that exist, and the ones that are coming all cater to consumer applications.  There is nothing wrong with providing consumer applications, but who is going to provide applications for small and medium business personnel?  After all, there are over 120,000,000 of them in the US alone.

We are early on in this new world of app stores, and we are off to a great start.  But to really unlock the potential of mobility for business users, the app store landscape will need to change to address these and other issues.

February 26, 2009

No Microsoft Smartphone Coming

2009 Mobile World Congress

Steve Ballmer

After months of speculation and rumors about a new Microsoft smartphone, and months of Microsoft denying said speculation and rumors, Steve Ballmer finally made it clear that Microsoft will not release a smartphone.

Seems like a smart move as I really don’t hear a lot of people clamoring for one. Even so, many analysts and bloggers expected a 2009 release to compete with RIM/BlackBerry and Apple/iPhone.

Apple still has the device to beat and Ballmer seems to be happy to let them keep the current “mojo” in the consumer market. Ballmer’s strategy is to continue to build upon the Windows Mobile (actually now Windows Phones) platform and make it as compatible with as many devices as possible. Though not unique, this strategy is very different from Apple’s and RIM’s, whereby they both have a proprietary device and proprietary operating system. Stirring it up even more, Palm recently announced the Pre as well as a new mobile platform called webOS.

Historically, the proprietary device/OS strategy has worked for many mobile phone providers, but I believe this may be changing. From a business user’s perspective (me), the real value in “smartdevices” comes from the business applications (increasing productivity and reducing costs) that run on it. Highly restrictive access to the OS or having to develop across an endless sea of proprietary platforms makes it difficult for mobile application companies to create solutions that can run on every device. 

I would personally like to see a handful of the best OS platforms be able to run across all the devices – and carrier networks. But I won’t hold my breath just yet.

Copyright 2010 MacroSolve, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
ReForm XT™ is Patent Pending. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the macrosolve.com Privacy Policy and Disclaimer.